This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 16:23, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
Even if this particular group of poker players was really "One of the more ineteresting stories" about the history or the recent history of poker, it would not be encyclopedic or notable. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:25, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete - unverifiable, reads like vanity. -- Cyrius|✎ 00:07, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 04:13, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.